Home > Misc > Suspended from G+ for name violation. This name, is “Bastard Sheep”. #nymwars

Suspended from G+ for name violation. This name, is “Bastard Sheep”. #nymwars

My Google Profile has just been flagged for not complying with the names policy.  I was just refreshing my Google+ page and the message shown to the left came up.  As you can see, it clearly states that the Google+ names policy is to “use the name that you are commonly referred to in real life”This name, is “Bastard Sheep”.

Because the name I am most commonly referred to in real life is in actual fact “Bastard Sheep”, I clicked on “Edit Name” and made no changes.  The only option I had (not screenshot, sorry) was “submit for review”, so I did.  After that, I was taken to the following screen.

As you can see, it states reviews usually take a few days to complete and I will “have full access to Google+ and all other Google services” in the meantime.  I have tested it, and unlike Stilgherrian, it would appear as though I do actually still have full access to Google+ for now under my name.  This name, is “Bastard Sheep”.

I decided my next step would be to click on the “Names Policy” link in the above screenshot, and was taken to this page.

Again, Google quite clearly state that “Google Profiles requires you to use the name that you commonly go by in daily life”This name, is “Bastard Sheep”.

“Use your full first and last name in a single language.”
“Bastard Sheep” is all in English, it is the full first and last names.  Check.

Avoid unusual characters in your name.”
“Bastard Sheep” is all alphabetical. Check.

“Your profile and name must represent one person.”
I am one person. Check.

“Don’t use the name of another individual.”
To the best of my knowledge there are no other individuals anywhere who use this name.  Check.

So far so good.  I should be happily able to use my name.  This name, is “Bastard Sheep”.

Some more clicking around and I came across this page.

“To help fight spam and prevent fake profiles, use the name your friends, family or co-workers usually call you.”

I don’t use Google+ to communicate with co-workers as I have a strict policy of keeping my personal and professional lives separate.  Due to this, we can confidently erase the “or co-workers” from that line leaving just friends and family.  Friends and family do know me by a certain name.  This name, is “Bastard Sheep”.

So far, it would appear as though my name “Bastard Sheep”, is in full and complete compliance with Google Profiles’ and Google+’s naming policies.  I am looking forward to Google completing their review and finding that my name was incorrectly flagged as being problematic.  This name, is “Bastard Sheep”.

… I somehow doubt this will happen though.

I will continue to keep everyone updated as there’s any progress on my name.  This name, is “Bastard Sheep”.

Further links:

Categories: Misc Tags: , , , ,
  1. 17/08/2011 at 5:04 pm

    Heck, I don’t even know your ‘real’ name. You’e Bastard Sheep to me, and I’d be willing to state that officially.

  2. 17/08/2011 at 5:07 pm

    “I don’t use Google+ to communicate with co-workers as I have a strict policy of keeping my personal and professional lives separate. Due to this, we can confidently erase the “or co-workers” from that line leaving just friends and family. ”

    Bzzzzzzz.

    The consolidated outcome of the rules as they state, is that you must use the legal common name which is applicable to both people you associate with professionally and personally. That’s not bastard sheep.

    Whether or not the rules are a good idea and how they should be policed are ongoing sources of interest in the online community and unresolved, but dude, you broke the current rules by any reasonable reading of them, and you knew you were.

    • 17/08/2011 at 5:12 pm

      I don’t use it to communicate with colleagues, why should I use a name they know me by?

      Google explicitly say in many MANY locations as I have shown that I am to use the name I am commonly known by in real life. That name is “Bastard Sheep”.

      You’re right though, I know they are referring to the name in my wallet but that would anonymise me and completely negate the whole point of a “social network” as the name in my wallet is not the name I use socially. To make the “social network” actually work, I need to use the name I am best known by. This is why I’m speaking up for the ability to be allowed to use “Bastard Sheep”.

  3. 17/08/2011 at 5:39 pm

    Valid points. I dunno how I feel about all this, it seems a case of everyone mistaking a cathedral for a bazaar (if you get the reference) and getting outraged over it. I thought it was silly of you to think you could exclude rules based on your use case, but your social network argument is compelling. If a social network is an online version of who we know, then it should be how we know.

    One thing’s for sure, there’s enough backlash that something will need to give somewhere.

  1. 22/08/2011 at 7:47 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: